Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.ĭrumwright, M. Ties that bind: A social contracts approach to business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 437–457.ĭonaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. A cognitive-intuitionist model of moral judgment. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(1), 1–6.ĭe George, R. Guest editors’ introduction on understanding ethical behavior and decision making: A behavioral ethics approach. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.ĭe Cremer, D., Mayer, D. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.ĭane, E., & Pratt, M. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd ed., pp. Self-understanding and its role in social and moral development. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 221–259.ĭamasio, A. A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. New York: Cambridge University Press.Ĭraft, J. Bazerman (Eds.), Conflicts of interest (pp. Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 485–497.Ĭhugh, D., Bazerman, M. Developing a multidimensional scale for ethical decision making. Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Vulnerability and the basis of business ethics: From fiduciary duties to professionalism. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14–31.īrown, E. Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 927–940.īrass, D. An empirical study of ethical predispositions. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 307–315.īrady, F. General causal models in business ethics: An essay on colliding research traditions. Teaching business ethics: The effectiveness of common pedagogical practices in developing students’ moral judgment competence. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 265–280.īosco, S. A behavioral model of ethical and unethical decision making. California Management Review, 32, 73–78.īommer, M., Gratto, C., Gravender, J., & Tuttle, M. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525–537.īird, F. Moral hypocrisy: appearing moral to oneself without being so. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. British Journal of Management, 14, 223–235.īatson, D., Thompson, E. Management and business ethics: A critique and integration of ethical decision-making models. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.īartlett, D. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Report to the nations on occupational fraud and abuse: 2014 Global Fraud Study, Austin, Texas.īandura, A. New York: HarperCollins.Īssociation of Certified Fraud Examiners. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 9–23.Īriely, D. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Thomson: Mason, OH.Īnand, V., Ashforth, B. An emotion-based model of salesperson ethical behaviors. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Īgnihotri, J., Rapp, A., Kothandaraman, P., & Singh, R. Research companion to ethical behavior in organizations: Constructs and measures. Finally, the limitations of the proposed model are presented.Īgle, B. Third, the academic and managerial implications of the proposed model are discussed. The individual and situational factors as well as the process of the proposed model are then described. Second, the proposed model, called ‘Integrated Ethical Decision Making,’ is introduced in order to fill the gaps and bridge the current divide in EDM theory. These models can generally be divided into (a) rationalist-based (i.e., reason) and (b) non-rationalist-based (i.e., intuition and emotion). First, a review of the various theoretical models of EDM is provided. To do so, the paper is organized as follows. To address this deficiency, a revised EDM model is proposed that consolidates and attempts to bridge together the varying and sometimes directly conflicting propositions and perspectives that have been advanced. Ethical decision-making (EDM) descriptive theoretical models often conflict with each other and typically lack comprehensiveness.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |